10 July 2019
2 min read
#Planning, Environment & Sustainability
Published by:
The Murray-Darling Basin Plan and associated controversy continues to make news. Monday night’s ABC Four Corners program ‘Cash Splash’ looked at the alleged waste of taxpayer money under the multi-billion plan.
The program reported:
"The Murray-Darling Basin Plan is a triple bottom line fail. It's a fail for communities, it's a fail for the economy and it's absolutely a fail for the environment." - Business owner
"I would characterise it as pink batts for farmers, or pink batts for earth movers. It all had to happen in a short space of time." - Contractor
"We're degrading the rivers at the same time as we're handing out money to a few individuals to realise huge economic gains at public cost." - Ecologist
"Anyone can come in and buy water. You don't even have to be a farmer...You're going to make money out of it, and that's what a lot of people are doing, unfortunately." - Farmer
"We're talking about billions of dollars in taxpayers' money on a scheme that many, many capable and reliable scientists have said, this isn't going to work." - Lawyer
A link to the ABC's Cash Splash video and transcript is available here.
The program follows an earlier Four Corners investigation in relation to alleged water theft in the Murray-Darling Basin, and the South Australian Royal Commission into the Murray-Darling Basin which in early 2019 reported its findings in relation to maladministration and negligence by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
See our previous articles on this topic below:
Royal Commission finds Murray-Darling Basin Plan partly unlawful
What were the key findings of the SA Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission?
The Murray-Darling Basin Plan controversy
Author: Dr Joseph Monaghan
Disclaimer
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this publication is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. We are not responsible for the information of any source to which a link is provided or reference is made and exclude all liability in connection with use of these sources.
Published by:
